City Digital Model: Principles and Approaches to Implementation
Abstract
This paper considered the application of a systems approach to the decomposition and description of a city as a system formed by an urban environment, by people with special features of their behavior in the city as well as urban infrastructure which provide city functioning. The considered approach is used as a methodological basis for the requirements formation for the urban areas development. This allows ensuring the structured and consistent requirements, which is quite an urgent task when planning the urban areas development. The paper shows that the proposed approach can be applied as a basis for building a city digital model, as a tool for solving complex problems of urban development. In particular, an analysis of natural and climatic factors that have a fundamental influence on the smart city construction is provided. It is proposed to use machine-learning methods to form the information basis of a city digital model.
Full Text:
PDF (Russian)References
Strategic Management of Socio-Economic Development: Methodological Framework and Application Tools / Eds. A.V. Mehrentsev. Ural State Forest Engineering University. 2015. (in Russian)
Agarwal A.K., Agarwal S.A.K. Management and Socio-Economic Development. New Delhi: Mittal Publications, 2014.
Zhang Y. et al. Real-time Machine Learning Prediction of an Agent-Based Model for Urban Decision-making // Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. – International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2018. P. 2171-2173.
Kontokosta C. E., Tull C. A data-driven predictive model of city-scale energy use in buildings // Applied energy. 2017. Vol. 197. P. 303-317.
Psyllidis A., Bozzon A., Bocconi S., Bolivar C.T. A Platform for Urban Analytics and Semantic Data Integration in City Planning. Springer, 2015.
Wu N., Silva E. A. Artificial intelligence solutions for urban land dynamics: a review //Journal of Planning Literature. 2010. Vol. 24, №. 3. P. 246-265.
Hawas M.A. Are We Intentionally Limiting Urban Planning and Intelligence? A Causal Evaluative Review and Methodical Redirection for Intelligence Systems // IEEE Access. 2017. Vol. 5.P. 13253-13259.
Alonso L., Zhang Y.R., Grignard A., Noyman A., Sakai Y., ElKatsha M., Larson K. Cityscope: a data-driven interactive simulation tool for urban design. Use case volpe // International Conference on Complex Systems. Springer, Cham, 2018. P. 253-261.
Griego D. et al. Sensing and mining urban qualities in smart cities //Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA) // 2017 IEEE 31st International Conference. 2017. P. 1004-1011.
Fornara F., Bonaiuto M., Bonnes, M. Cross-Validation of Abbreviated Perceived Residential Environment Quality (PREQ) and Neighborhood Attachment (NA) Indicators // Environment and Behavior. 2010. Vol. 42 (2). P. 171−196.
Dębek M. Towards people’s experiences and behaviours within their worlds: The integrative-transactional framework for studying complex people-environment interactions // Social Space. 2014. Vol. 8 (2). P. 1−55.
Rodoman B. B.Districting As a Way of Possessing Space // Regional Research of Russia. 2018. Vol. 8 (4). P. 301-307. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970518040081
Vidyasova L.A., Smirnova P.V. The study of the image of the “smart city” through the eyes of the inhabitants of St. Petersburg // Russian Information Resources. 2019. №2. P.35-38. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37262177 (in Russian)
Magarotto M., Faria de Deus R., Costa M.F., Masanet E. Green areas in coastal cities – Conflict of interests or stakeholders’ perspectives? // International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 2017. Vol. 12 (8). P. 1260–1271. DOI: 10.2495/SDP-V12-N8-1260-1271
Stojanovski T. City Information Modelling (CIM) and Urban Design // City modelling & GIS. 2018. Vol. 1 (36). P. 506-516/
Stojanovski T. City Information Modeling (CIM) and Urbanism: blocks, connections, territories, people and situations // Society for Computer Simulation International. Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design, San Diego, 2013. P. 12.
IPCC Climate Change, Synthesis. Rep. Cont. W. G. I II III Fifth Assessment Rep IPCC. 2014. ed R K Pachauri and L A Meyer (Geneva: IPCC) p. 151.
Bronnimann S., Martius O., von Waldow H., Welker C., Luterbacher J., Compo G.P., Sardeshmukh P.D., Usbeck T. Extreme winds at northern mid-latitudes since 1871 // Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 2012. Vol. 21 (1). P.13-27.
Report on climate risks in the Russian Federation. SPb, 2017. 106 p. (in Russian).
Evstigneev V.M., Kislov A.V., Sidorova M.V. The impact of climate change on the annual flow of the rivers of the East European Plain in the XXI century// Vestnik MGU, vol. 5. Geography. 2010. № 2. pp. 3-10 (in Russian).
Polonsky A., Evstigneev V., Naumova V., Voskresenskaya E. Low-frequency variability of storms in the northern Black sea and associated processes in the ocean-atmosphere system // Reg. Environ. Change. –2014. – Vol.14, No.5. – P.1861-1871.
Zhang Z., Hu H., Tian F., Yao X., Sivapalan M. Groundwater dynamics under water-saving irrigation and implications for sustainable water management in an oasis: Tarim River basin of western China // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014. Vol. 18. P. 3951-3967.
Seto K.C., Sánchez-Rodríguez R., Fragkias M. The New Geography of Contemporary Urbanization and the Environment // Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2010. Vol. 35 (1). P. 167–194.
Burton et al. Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies, and Measures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, NY. 2005.
Rosenzweig C., Solecki W., Hammer S.A., Mehrotra S. Cities lead the way in climatechange action // Nature. 2010. Vol. 467 (7318). P. 909-911.
Bazaz A., Bertoldi P., Buckeridge M., Cartwright A., de Coninck H., Engelbrecht F. et al. Summary for Urban Policymakers–What the IPCC Special Report on 1.5°C Means for Cities, IHHS Indian Institute for Human Settlements, Bengaluru. India, 2018. 30 p.
Albino V., Berardi U., Dangelico R.M. Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives // Journal of Urban Technology. 2015. Vol. 22 (1). P. 3-21.
Batty M., Axhausen K.W., Giannotti F., Pozdnoukhov A., Bazzani A., Wachowicz M., Ouzounis G., Portugali Y. Smart cities of the future // The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 2012. Vol. 214 (1). P. 481-518.
Giffinger R., Gudrun H. Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE archit // City Environment. 2010. Vol. 4. P. 7-26.
Kummitha R.K.R., Crutzen, N. How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective // Cities. 2017. Vol. 67. P. 43-52
YandexMaps: Abinsky District of the Krasnodar Territory, Russia.
https://yandex.ru/maps/?ll=38.192211 (in Russian)
Narbut, N., Matushkina, L.: Selection and justification of environmental criteria for assessing the state of the urban environment. In: Vestnik TOGU, 2009. № 3 (14). P. 71-76. (in Russian)
Woody Plants Area Estimation Using Ordinary Satellite Images and Deep Learning / A. Golubev, N. Sadovnikova, D. Parygin, I. Glinyanova, A. Finogeev, M. Shcherbakov // DTGS 2018 : Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Digital Transformation and Global Society, St. Petersburg, Russia, 20 May–2 June 2018. – Springer IPS, 2018. – CCIS 858. – Part 1. – P. 302–313. – DOI : 10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_24
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Abava Кибербезопасность MoNeTec 2024
ISSN: 2307-8162