Criteria for the Selection of IT Projects Based on the Public Value Concept
Abstract
The paper provides an overview of the approaches used in world practice to assess the results of state IT projects from the point of view of the public value they create. A method of preliminary assessment and selection of IT projects based on the described approaches and analysis of key factors is proposed.
A review of publications devoted to the assessment of the created public value indicates that this direction of research is promising and actively developed by a large number of research teams around the world.
While most of the research in the described area is dedicated to assessing the public value created by IT projects based on the opinions of interested party’s analysis, the author proposes an adaptation of existing theoretical developments for the purpose of preliminary assessment and prediction of the created public value based on an analysis of key factors affecting the expected IT project results.
The paper presents the concept and the main sources of public value created by state IT projects, the rationale and the proposed model of an cognitive map for integrated predictive effectiveness assessment of IT projects and the results of its experimental verification.
It seems that this model can serve as a basis for a preliminary assessment and selection of IT projects proposed for implementation in the framework of the Smart City programs.
Full Text:
PDF (Russian)References
Friedland C., Gross T. Measuring the public value of e-government: Methodology of a South African case study // Proceedings of the 1st Africa 2010 Conference, IIMC International Information Management Corporation. 2010.
Moore M.H. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management, in Government. Boston, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Jørgensen T.B., Bozeman B. Public values an inventory // Administration & Society. 2007. Vol. 39 (3). P. 354-381.
Alford J., Hughes O. Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management // American Review of Public Administration. 2008. Vol. 38(2). P. 130-148.
Bryson J., Crosby B., Bloomberg L. Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management // Public Administration Review. 2014. Vol. 74 (4). P. 445-456.
Di Maio A. Value for Money Is Not Enough in Public Sector IT projects. Stamford, C.T.: Gartner Research, 2003.
Guide to regional good practice e-government. Brussels: Innovative Actions Network for the Information Society Secretariat, 2007.
Castelnovo W., Simonetta M. The public value evaluation of e-government policies // The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation. 2007. Vol. 11 (2). P. 61–72.
Yu C. Building a value centric e-government service framework based on a business model perspective // Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2008. Vol. 5184, P. 160–171.
Cresswell A.M., Burke G.B., Pardo T.A. Advancing return on investment analysis for government IT: A public value framework. New York: CTG, University at Albany, SUNY, 2006.
Pardo T. et al. Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective // Information Polity. 2012. Vol. 17, # 2. P. 83-97.
Beninton J., Moor M. Public Value Theory and Practice. Basinstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Karunasena K. An Investigation of the Public Value of e-Government in Sri Lanka. PhD Dissertation. 2012. URL: https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:160100/Thanthri_Waththage.pdf
Sigwejo A. A citizen-centric framework for assessing e-government effectivenessju PhD Dissertationju 2016. URL: http://datad.aau.org/handle/11189/5854
Hiziroglu A. Measuring The Public Value of E-Government: Evidence From Turkey // Proceedings of The IRES International Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 27th -28th January 2017. URL: http://www.worldresearchlibrary.org/up_proc/pdf/684-14879327641-8.pdf
Chu P.Y. et al. A Longitudinal Research of Public Value and Electronic Governance Development in Taiwan // 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV’17, New Delhi, India — March 07 - 09, 2017). Proceedings. 2017. P. 459-464.
Páscoa C., Moreira V., Tribolet J. Effectiveness index as an organizational cockpit instrument // Procedia Technology. 2012. Vol. 5. P. 244-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.027
Trutnev D.R. Ocenka jeffektivnosti gosudarstvennyh informacionnyh sistem: podhody i metody // Informacionnye resursy Rossii. 2017. #3. S. 34-36. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29305123
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Abava Кибербезопасность MoNeTec 2024
ISSN: 2307-8162