Agriculture 4.0: Synergy of the System of Systems, Ontology, the Internet of Things, and Space Technologies

Vasily Kupriyanovsky, Yuri Lipuntsov, Oleg Grinko, Dmitry Namiot

Abstract


The article deals with issues related to digital agriculture. In the first part of the paper, basic technologies are considered that ensure accurate farming. First of all, they include navigation systems and unmanned aerial vehicles. Next, we are talking about automatic control systems. The article provides an overview of a large number of EU projects that support accurate farming. In particular, the paper considers the European project Internet of Food & Farm 2020 (IoF2020), which explores the potential of Internet technologies Things for the European food and agricultural industry. This project aims to make farming a reality and to make a vital step towards creating a more sustainable value chain. With the help of Internet technologies, Things are expected to receive higher yields and better products. The use of pesticides and fertilizers will decrease, and the overall efficiency will be optimized. Internet technologies also provide better traceability of food products, leading to improved food safety.


Full Text:

PDF (Russian)

References


Precision Farming: Image of the Day". http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov. Retrieved Oct, 2018.

McBratney, A., Whelan, B., Ancev, T., 2005. Future Directions of Precision Agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 6, 7-23.

Whelan, B.M., McBratney, A.B., 2003. Definition and Interpretation of potential management zones in Australia, In: Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference, Geelong, Victoria, Feb. 2-6 2003.

Howard, J.A., Mitchell, C.W., 1985. Phytogeomorphology. Wiley.

Kaspar, T.C, Colvin, T.S., Jaynes, B., Karlen, D.L., James, D.E, Meek, D.W., 2003. Relationship between six years of corn yields and terrain attributes. Precision Agriculture, 4, 87-101.

McBratney, A.B. & Pringle, M.J. Precision Agriculture (1999) 1: 125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995404447

Reyns, P., Missotten, B., Ramon, H. et al. Precision Agriculture (2002) 3: 169. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013823603735

Chris Anderson, "Agricultural Drones Relatively cheap drones with advanced sensors and imaging capabilities are giving farmers new ways to increase yields and reduce crop damage.", MIT Technology Review, May/June, 2014. Retrieved Oct, 2018.

Digital Agriculture https://consulting.ey.com/digital-agriculture-helping-to-feed-a-growing-world/ 01-10-2018 Retrieved Oct, 2018

EGNOS and GALILEO for AGRICULTURE High Precision, Low Cost

Weltzien, Cornelia. "Digital Agriculture or Why Agriculture 4.0 Still Offers Only Modest Returns." Landtechnik 71.2 (2016): 66-68.

AGRICULTURE 4.0: THE FUTURE OF FARMING TECHNOLOGY In Collaboration With Oliver Wyman WORLD GOVERNMENT SUMMIT February 2018, Authors Matthieu De Clercq, Anshu Vats,Alvaro Biel

The Future of Farming /UK agricultural policy after Brexit. A Policy Network Paper ,Charlie Cadywould , Policy Network , January 2018

Engineering Connected Intelligence. A Socio-Technical Perspective.

Prof.dr. Bedir Tekinerdogan Inaugural lecture upon taking up the position of Professor of Information Technology at Wageningen University & Research on 2 February 2017

IoF2020 D3.1: Guidelines for Use-Case Analysis & Design 2017

IoF2020 D3.2: The IoF2020 Use-Case Architectures and overview of the related IoT Systems 2017

IoF2020 D3.3: Opportunities and Barriers in the present regulatory situation for system development 2018

IoF2020 D3.9: Progress Report on Synergy Analysis, Decisions and Coordination of Work 2018

IoF2020 D4.1: KPI Catalogue for each use-case 2017

IoF2020 D4.2: Methodology to assess market outlook and social impact for each use-case 2017

Sundmaeker, Harald, et al. "Internet of food and farm 2020." Digitising the Industry-Internet of Things connecting physical, digital and virtual worlds. Ed: Vermesan, O., & Friess, P (2016): 129-151.

IoF2020 D4.3: Taxonomy of business models relevant to IoT applications 2017

Shaping the digital (r)evolution in agriculture EU 2017

DataBio: D1.1 Agriculture Pilot Definition v1.1 2018-04-26 LESPRO

DataBio: D6.4 Data-driven bioeconomy pilots v1.0 2018-02-28 CiaoT

DataBio: D7.1 Business Plan v2.1 2018-02-06 UStG

DataBio: D7.3 PESTLE Analysis v1.0 2017-12-29 VTT

DataBio: D6.3 State of the Art v1.0 2017-12-29 VTT

DataBio: D5.1 EO Component Specification v1.0 2017-12-29 SPACEBEL

DataBio: D3.1 Fishery Pilot Definition – v1.0 – 2017-10-20

DataBio: D6.1 Dissemination Materials Website – v1.0 – 2017-04-29

DataBio: D1.1 Agriculture Pilot Definition – v1.0 – 2017-06-30

DataBio: D2.1 Forestry Pilot Definition – v1.0 – 2017-06-30

DataBio: D6.2 Data Management Plan – v1.0 – 2017-06-30

SemaGrow D1.3.1 First Annual Public Report November 2013

SemaGrow D1.3.2 Second Annual Public Report November 2014

SemaGrow D1.3.3 Third Annual Public Report November 2015

SemaGrow D1.4 Quality Assurance & Risk Assessment Plan November 2014

SemaGrow D2.1 Envisaged Applications & Use Cases July 2014

SemaGrow D2.3 Large Scale Distributed Architecture March 2016

SemaGrow D3.1 Techniques for Resource Discovery Report, Prototype March 2016

SemaGrow D3.2 Techniques for Ontology Alignment Report, Prototype March 2016

SemaGrow D3.3 Techniques for Content Classification & Ontology Evolution Report, Prototype July 2015

SemaGrow D3.4 Techniques for Heterogeneous Distributed Semantic Querying Report, Prototype July 2015

SemaGrow D4.1 Scalability & Robustness Experimental Methodology Report December 2013

SemaGrow D4.2 Experimental Report on Current Data Sets Report November 2014


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abava  Кибербезопасность MoNeTec 2024

ISSN: 2307-8162