Cultural Challenges to Practical AI Ethics: Problems and Solutions
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has amplified the need for ethical frameworks that are not only theoretically robust but also practically implementable. Practical ethics of AI emerges as a pivotal field, bridging the gap between abstract ethical principles and actionable strategies. This article delves into the concept of practical ethics for AI, emphasizing its role in real-world decision-making processes and its applicability across diverse industries. Unlike traditional ethical theories, practical AI ethics focuses on operationalizing principles like fairness, transparency, and accountability within the constraints of technological and societal contexts.
A critical aspect of practical AI ethics is its engagement with cultural diversity, a factor often overlooked in mainstream discourse. Cultural norms and values significantly influence how AI systems are designed, deployed, and perceived across different societies. This article examines how cultural issues intersect with AI ethics, highlighting both challenges and opportunities. Through an analysis of existing frameworks, such as utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, and their relevance to AI, the discussion extends to the incorporation of culturally inclusive practices. Case studies from healthcare, education, and governance illustrate how culturally attuned AI systems can enhance trust and effectiveness while mitigating biases. Finally, the article proposes a set of actionable guidelines and metrics for embedding cultural sensitivity into AI ethical audits, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure AI systems are ethically sound and culturally resonant. By integrating cultural metrics into practical ethics, the article seeks to advance a more holistic and globally relevant approach to AI governance.
Full Text:
PDF (Russian)References
A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, “ The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines.” Nature Machine Intelligence,1(9), pp.389–399, 2019
C.Сath, “Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.37620180080, 2018, http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080.
S. Noble, “Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism,” Science, no. 374, pp. 542-542, 2021, DOI:10.1126/science.abm5861
B. D. Mittelstadt, P. Allo, M. Taddeo, S. Wachter, and L. Floridi, “The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate,” Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679.
M. Brundage, B. Garfinkel, S. Avin, J. Clark, and H. Toner, “The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation,” 2018, https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1802/1802.07228.pdf.
DataRobot’s State of AI Bias Report Reveals 81% of Technology Leaders Want Government Regulation of AI Bias (Report). DataRobot, 2022. URL: https://www.datarobot.com/newsroom/press/datarobots-state-of-ai-bias-report-reveals-81-of-technology-leaders-want-government-regulation-of-ai-bias/ (accessed date: 30.09.2024).
Artificial Intelligence Index Report. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, April 2024 https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/ (accessed date: 11.10.2024).
S. Kladko, “Cultural-Ethical Evaluation in the Launch of AI Education Technologies,” Agents and Multi-agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. Vol 35, pp. 265-275, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3068-5_24.
R. Binns, "Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy," in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, vol. 81, pp. 1–11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.03586.
L. Floridi, J. Cowls, M. Beltrametti, et al., “AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations,” Minds & Machines, Vol. 28, pp. 689–707, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
A. Sison, and I. Ferrero, “How different is neo-Aristotelian virtue from positive organizational virtuousness?,” Special Issue: Virtues and Virtuousness: Will the Twain Ever Meet?, Volume24, Issue S2, August 2015, pp. S78-S98, https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12099.
N. Wiener, “Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine,” MIT Press, 1948.
J. Weizenbaum, “Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation,” W. H. Freeman and Company, 1976.
J. H. Moor, “What is Computer Ethics?” Metaphilosophy, no. 16, pp. 266-275, 1985, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x.
L. Floridi, “What is the Philosophy of Information?” January 24, 2002, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3862333.
R. Chatila, J.C. Havens, “The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems,” in Aldinhas Ferreira, M., Silva Sequeira, J., Singh Virk, G., Tokhi, M., E. Kadar, E. (eds) Robotics and Well-Being. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 95. Springer, pp.11-16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12524-0_2.
Ethically Aligned Design A Vision For Prioritizing Wellbeing With Artificial Intelligence And Autonomous Systems, 2016, http://www.standards.ieee.org/develop/indconn/ec/autonomous_systems.html (accessed date: 07.10.2024).
J.M. Alvarez, A.B. Colmenarejo, A. Elobaid, et al., “Policy advice and best practices on bias and fairness in AI,” Ethics Inf Technol, no. 26, 31, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09746-w.
Z. Obermeyer, B. Powers, Ch. Vogeli, and S. Mullainathan, “Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations,” Science, no. 366, pp. 447-453, 2019, DOI:10.1126/science.aax2342.
Google AI Principles, 2018, https://ai.google/responsibility/principles/ (accessed date: 10.11.2024)
L. Floridi, “Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI,” Nat Mach Intell, no. 1, pp. 261–262, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0055-y.
N. Bostrom, "Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies," Oxford University Press, 2017.
I. Spiegel, “Criticizing Ethics According to Artificial Intelligence,” 2024, https://arxiv.org/html/2408.04609v1.
L. Munn, “The uselessness of AI ethics,” AI Ethics, vol. 3, pp. 869–877, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w.
L. Floridi, “Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical,” Philos. Technol., no. 32, pp. 185–193, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x.
W.J. von Eschenbach, “Transparency and the Black Box Problem: Why We Do Not Trust AI,” Philos. Technol., no. 34, pp. 1607–1622, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0.
N.K. Corrêa, C. Galvão, J.W. Santos, et al, “Worldwide AI ethics: A review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance,” Patterns, vol. 4(10),100857, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100857.
B. Mittelstadt, “Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 501–507, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4.
D. Lauer, “You cannot have AI ethics without ethics,” AI Ethics, vol. 1, pp. 21–25, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00013-4.
A. Caliskan, J. Bryson, and A. Narayanan, “Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases,” Science, vol. 356(6334), pp.183-186, 2017.
A. Hagerty, and I. Rubinov, “Global AI Ethics: A Review of the Social Impacts and Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence,” 2019, https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07892 (accessed date: 17.10.2024).
P. Wong, “Cultural Differences as Excuses? Human Rights and Cultural Values in Global Ethics and Governance of AI,” Philos. Technol., 33, pp. 705–715, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00413-8.
E. Goffi, L. Colin, and S. Belouali, “Ethical assessment of AI cannot ignore cultural pluralism: a call for broader perspective on AI ethics,” The International Journal of Human Rights, vol. 1(2), pp. 151–175, 2021.
F. Trompenaars, “Artificial intelligence: control it or go with the flow,” October, 22, 2018, https://www.peoplematters.in/article/technology/artificial-intelligence-control-it-or-go-with-the-flow-19612 (дата обращения: 02.11.2024).
J. Morley, L. Floridi, L. Kinsey, et al, “From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 26, pp. 2141–2168, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Abava Кибербезопасность IT Congress 2024
ISSN: 2307-8162